That Jew is Dead

Netanyahu is dead. DEAD!

All Netanyahu has to do to prove otherwise is go on Piers Morgan or shake hands with Trump in front of the US press corps. He could even talk with his buddy Andrew (or is it Chris?) Cuomo on live TV, like he has done previously. He has never been shy about addressing hardened skeptics at the UN General Assembly, even as scores of attendees fritter away. Why stop now? Posting one pre-recorded meeting after another does not prove at all that he is alive. But also never underestimate Jewish chutzpah; they may ride fake-Netanyahu for many years to come and admit nothing. But he has definitely been eliminated.

Israel has made three fake videos for sure. The six-finger video, a second fake video of Netanyahu sipping coffee with disappearing and reappearing wedding ring, and a third of him against a backdrop of his Chiefs of Staff (one of whom has an elongated pinky finger).

The fourth video with Huckabee finally manages to “sort out” any blatant AI markers, but the video is brief and pre-recorded. Why? And why is Huckabee in Israel?

Fake-Netanyahu’s “hilarious” call-out of six fingers does not address at all WHY six fingers appear in the first place while simultaneously admitting this is true! This is a page right out of the Jon Stewart-Liberal-comedy/irony playbook, meaning a play not to the dumb plebs but to so-called Liberal educated latte-sipping elites. To these sorts of entitled yuppies, the fact that one can laugh at oneself is indicative of moral superiority and hence truth.

Does anyone remember Jew Seinfeld parodying Oliver Stone’s JFK? (For Seinfeld nerds, the episode is The Boyfriend, S3 E18). In JFK, Jim Garrison (played by Kevin Costner) heroically questions the Warren Commission’s “single-bullet theory” as (sarcastically) a “magic-bullet theory.” Even today, all one has to do is watch the film and listen to the refrain:

“Back and to the left.”
“Back and to the left.”
“Back and to the left.”

The charge is enough for anyone with any common sense to deduce that OF COURSE a single bullet fired from behind, i.e. from the Texas book depository by Lee Harvey Oswald, cannot possibly account for everything that happened in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963.

Do you see what I mean? You don’t even have to believe that Oswald was a patsy. Believe fully that he was out to kill JFK as the Communist stooge that he was. Believe even that he fired multiple shots! But please tell me how you simultaneously account for “back and to the left”?

The same goes for 9/11. Even if I fully concede that planes flew into towers North and South on September 11, 2001, how on earth did Building 7 collapse when it wasn’t struck by a plane? And please don’t tell me that “structural sympathy” caused this building to fall. That is laughable. As laughable as the “single-bullet theory.”

I am willing to grant to you that Oswald fired from the back, and that North and South towers fell because of airplanes flown by dastardly Muslim terrorists. But in good faith, please explain to me how “back and to the left” occurred (as is clearly seen via Zapruder) and how Building 7 collapsed.

The truth is, you have no answer. The only solution you have come up with is to ridicule the serious search for truth as somehow misplaced. And the only way to expose this seriousness is via humor. The Seinfeld episode at once admits the truth of Garrison’s critique of the single-bullet theory (as indeed ridiculous) while simultaneously ridiculing it. “One magic loogie” actually means: yes, the single-bullet theory is worthy of ridicule (as the “magic-bullet theory”) but any serious quest for truth in the aftermath is worthier of even more ridicule!

The Liberal says: Sure the ideas that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone and Building 7 fell due to structural sympathy are ludicrous. But your subsequent speculation without “evidence” as to “what really happened” is even more ludicrous. Therefore, my ability to laugh at you substitutes for truth and effectively becomes the last word.

This is how the Liberal mind works.

In the case now of Netanyahu, Liberal fucktards are forced to concede that videos 1, 2, and 3 are ridiculous and even obnoxious AI fakes. But as soon as Netanyahu in video 4 calls attention, in perfect Liberal-ironic fashion, to the ridiculousness of the first three videos, Netanyahu is immediately absolved of all sins! Now all Liberals will fight and deny tooth-and-nail to maintain a tenuous and contradictory narrative where it becomes obvious that Netanyahu both faked his first three videos and is still alive!

In short, Liberal cowards depend on the same MSM they decry for verification. They simply cannot bring themselves to state the obvious. Jewish missteps require Jewish verification to be real. This is how much control Israel has over both mainstream and opposition narratives.